ar X iv : a st ro - p h / 99 01 31 9 v 1 2 2 Ja n 19 99 A secondary clump of red giant stars : why and where Léo Girardi

Based on the results of detailed population synthesis models, Girardi et al. (1998) recently claimed that the clump of red giants in the colour–magnitude diagram (CMD) of composite stellar populations should present an extension to lower luminosities, which goes down to about 0.4 mag below the main clump. This feature is made of stars just massive enough for having ignited helium in nondegenerate conditions, and therefore corresponds to a limited interval of stellar masses and ages. In the present models, which include moderate convective overshooting, it corresponds to ∼ 1 Gyr old populations. In this paper, we go into more details about the origin and properties of this feature. We first compare the clump theoretical models with data for clusters of different ages and metallicities, basically confirming the predicted behaviours. We then refine the previous models in order to show that: (i) The faint extension is expected to be clearly separated from the main clump in the CMD of metal-rich populations, defining a ‘secondary clump’ by itself. (ii) It should be present in all galactic fields containing ∼ 1 Gyr old stars and with mean metallicities higher than about Z = 0.004. (iii) It should be particularly strong, if compared to the main red clump, in galaxies which have increased their star formation rate in the last Gyr or so of their evolution. In fact, secondary clumps similar to the model predictions are observed in the CMD of nearby stars from Hipparcos data, and in those of some Large Magellanic Cloud fields observed to date. There are also several reasons why this secondary clump may be missing or hidden in other observed CMDs of galaxy fields. For instance, it becomes undistinguishable from the main clump if the photometric errors or differential absorption are larger than about 0.2 mag. Nonetheless, this structure may provide important constraints to the star formation history of Local Group galaxies. We comment also on the intrinsic luminosity variation and dispersion of clump stars, which may limit their use as either absolute or relative distance indicators, respectively.